2
12
192
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/61822c3460500138a801ea73dc9a960c.jp2
6aa61f92b73529ed0475262a43c915fe
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Maps
Still Image
A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Map of the Environs of Washington
Subject
The topic of the resource
Washington (D.C.)--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Maps
- Washington Metropolitan Area--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Maps
- Washington (D.C.)--Maps, Manuscript
- Washington Metropolitan Area--Maps, Manuscript
- Fortification--Washington (D.C.)--Maps
- Fortification--Washington Metropolitan Area--Maps
- Real property--Washington (D.C.)--Maps
- Real property--Washington Metropolitan Area--Maps
- Manuscript maps
- United States--District of Columbia--Washington
- United States--District of Columbia--Washington Metropolitan Area
Description
An account of the resource
Shows buildings, rural property lines, householders' names, and vegetation.
- Relief shown by contours and hachures. Depths shown by contours and soundings.
- India ink, col. ink, and col. wash.
- Northern section is printed map with ms. annotation. Remainder is completely ms.
- Originally drawn on 4 sheets, assembled to 1 sheet, and sectioned to 6 parts.
- On verso on label affixed to cloth backing: No. 187. L.
- LC Civil War maps (2nd ed.), 676
- Stephenson. Cartography of northern Virginia, pl. 56-58
- Available also through the Library of Congress Web site as a raster image.
- Vault
- DCP
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
US Coast Survey
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Barnard, J. G, A Boschke, and United States Coast Survey. Map of the environs of Washington: compiled from Boschkes' map of the District of Columbia and from surveys of the U.S. Coast Survey showing the line of the defences of Washington as constructed during the war from to 1865 inclusive. [?, 1865] Map. https://www.loc.gov/item/88690673/.
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Library of Congress
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1865
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
The maps in the Map Collections materials were either published prior to 1922, produced by the United States government, or both (see catalogue records that accompany each map for information regarding date of publication and source). The Library of Congress is providing access to these materials for educational and research purposes and is not aware of any U.S. copyright protection (see Title 17 of the United States Code) or any other restrictions in the Map Collection materials.
Note that the written permission of the copyright owners and/or other rights holders (such as publicity and/or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with persons desiring to use the item.
Credit Line: Library of Congress, Geography and Map Division.
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
1 map : col., ms., cloth backing ; 131 x 144 cm.
Language
A language of the resource
English
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
Map of the environs of Washington : compiled from Boschkes' map of the District of Columbia and from surveys of the U.S. Coast Survey showing the line of the defences of Washington as constructed during the war from 1861 to 1865 inclusive
Coverage
The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant
Washington DC region
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/31b756601429cb778c808d10a882fca4.tiff
fb7123f89a5eeb182fc525c7fc1bb995
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Drawings
Still Image
A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.
Original Format
The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data
photograph
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Drawing of Fort Ramsay
Subject
The topic of the resource
United States. Army--Military life
- Soldiers as artists
- United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Art and the war
- United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Personal narratives
- Artists
- Soldiers
- United States. Army. Massachusetts Artillery Battery, 9th (1862-1865)
- Art
- Illustration of books
- Manuscripts
- United States
Description
An account of the resource
Charles Wellington Reed Papers: Sketchbooks, 1863-1887, undated; Nos. 1-10, leaves 1-415
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Charles Wellington Reed
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Reed, Charles Wellington. Charles Wellington Reed Papers: Sketchbooks, -1887, undated; Nos. 1-10, leaves 1-415. 1862. Manuscript/Mixed Material. https://www.loc.gov/item/mss374570301/.
mss37457, box: 3
https://www.loc.gov/resource/mss37457.0301/?sp=205&r=0.406,0.267,0.346,0.206,0
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Library of Congress
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1862
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
public domain
9th Massachusetts Artillery
artists
charles Reed
Fort Ramsay
Upton's Hill
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/2468b563a478654a1fc38499ad41be3e.jpeg
0a673ac4c47a74aa757d774e98bfd7b5
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Official Documents
Subject
The topic of the resource
Important legal and other written records
Description
An account of the resource
Official records include petitions, and other legal documents
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Original Format
The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data
telegram
Text
Any textual data included in the document
United States Military Telegraph
Received July 21, 1861
From Camp Upton
"The officer who brought news said our troops occupied Germantown & Flint hill. Rebels burnt their bush tents & were retreating in every direction - where escape was not impeded by our troops."
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Abraham Lincoln papers: Series 1. General Correspondence. 1833-1916: Camp Upton Virginia, Sunday, July 21, 1861 (Telegram reporting battle at Manassas)
Subject
The topic of the resource
- United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865
- United States--Politics and government--1861-1865
- Presidents--United States
- Manuscripts
Description
An account of the resource
Telegram reporting battle at Manassas
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Abraham Lincoln Papers at the Library of Congress
https://www.loc.gov/item/mal1084100/
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Library of Congress
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
July 21, 1861
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
The Library of Congress’s digital scans of the papers of Abraham Lincoln are in the public domain.
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
online format - image
Language
A language of the resource
English
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Manuscript, telegram
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
Telegram report on the battle of Manassas
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/f77cc786d822bf65ccc506ad52bdd62b.jpg
689f83583427ef5d19e73cb6617a2aaf
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Drawings
Still Image
A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.
Original Format
The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data
drawing
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Redoubt No. 3 - Fort Ramsay
Subject
The topic of the resource
Engineering Drawing of Fort Cass (Fort Ramsay)
Description
An account of the resource
Plan, section & armament of Fort Cass (Fort Ramsay). Drawn from measurement taken Oct. 4 & 15, 1861. Originally named Fort Ramsay in August of 1861, it was later changed to Fort Cass by direct order of General George McClellan in the fall of 1861. The name Fort Ramsay was transferred to a fort constructed on Upton's Hill, Virginia near Falls Church.
* From "Mr. Lincoln's Forts: A Guide to the Civil War Defenses of Washington," by Benjamin Franklin Cooling III and Walton H. Owen II:
Named for Colonel Thomas Cass, of the 9th Massachusetts Infantry that constructed the fort. Built in August 1861, it was first named Fort Ramsay. It was one in a line of lunettes on Arlington Heights defending the approaches to the Aqueduct Bridge (near the site of the present day Key Bridge). The fort stood on present day Fort Myer, on Forest Circle. No visible remains.
Its perimeter extended 288 yards with 12 gun emplacements. Armament included four 24-pdr guns, three 6-pdr guns, five 20-pdr Parrott rifles, and one 24-pdr Coehorn mortar.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
War Department. Office of the Chief of Engineers
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
National Archives at College Park - Cartographic (RDSC)
National Archives at College Park
8601 Adelphi Road
College Park, MD 20740-6001
Phone: 301-837-3200
Fax: 301-837-3622
Email: carto@nara.gov
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
National Archives
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
Oct. 4 & 15, 1861
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Unrestricted
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
jpeg
Language
A language of the resource
English
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
File Unit: Drawer 169, 1818 - 1941
Series: Fortifications Map File Plans of Military Forts, 1818 - 1941
Record Group 77: Records of the Office of the Chief of Engineers, 1789 - 1999
Fort Cass
forts
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/9dfe5a4589de2f3550032c3a3acd9296.tif
b07aca0573d00e9470769bd8d63bbffd
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Augustus Hesse Letter
Subject
The topic of the resource
Antislavery movements--United States--History--19th century
Women abolitionists--Massachusetts--Boston--19th century--Correspondence
Antislavery movements--United States
Women abolitionists--United States
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865
Weston, Deborah, b. 1814
Hesse, Augustus, d. 1867
Description
An account of the resource
Letter from Augustus Hesse, Fort Ramsay at Upton's hill, Va., to Deborah Weston, December the 19th, 1862
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Hesse, Augustus, d. 1867
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
https://ark.digitalcommonwealth.org/ark:/50959/qz20tw35g
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Boston Public Library
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
December 19, 1862
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
No known copyright restrictions.
No known restrictions on use.
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
Letters/Correspondence
Manuscripts
Language
A language of the resource
English
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
Letter from Augustus Hesse from Fort Ramsay to Deborah Weston
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/dd8732596e284cd917dd245bc562f981.tif
db5daf54bafa484006acd5721445e8bc
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Augustus Hesse Letter
Subject
The topic of the resource
Antislavery movements--United States--History--19th century
Women abolitionists--Massachusetts--Boston--19th century--Correspondence
Antislavery movements--United States
Women abolitionists--United States
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865
Weston, Deborah, b. 1814
Hesse, Augustus, d. 1867
Description
An account of the resource
Letter from Augustus Hesse, Fort Ramsay at Upton's hill, Va., to Deborah Weston, December the 19th, 1862
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Hesse, Augustus, d. 1867
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
https://ark.digitalcommonwealth.org/ark:/50959/qz20tw35g
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Boston Public Library
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
December 19, 1862
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
No known copyright restrictions.
No known restrictions on use.
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/e76ed91ab7bd0e9e540d9ddec9cc5f49.tif
a3ea3268926d7c0375cef996167c46c6
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Augustus Hesse Letter
Subject
The topic of the resource
Antislavery movements--United States--History--19th century
Women abolitionists--Massachusetts--Boston--19th century--Correspondence
Antislavery movements--United States
Women abolitionists--United States
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865
Weston, Deborah, b. 1814
Hesse, Augustus, d. 1867
Description
An account of the resource
Letter from Augustus Hesse, Fort Ramsay at Upton's hill, Va., to Deborah Weston, December the 19th, 1862
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Hesse, Augustus, d. 1867
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
https://ark.digitalcommonwealth.org/ark:/50959/qz20tw35g
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Boston Public Library
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
December 19, 1862
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
No known copyright restrictions.
No known restrictions on use.
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
Letters/Correspondence
Manuscripts
Language
A language of the resource
English
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
Letter from Augustus Hesse from Fort Ramsay to Deborah Weston
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/be88c6b3008e11c81ed116a102f3e1f2.tif
36d3eefb5c3f042ce645b6f529b9732c
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Augustus Hesse Letter
Subject
The topic of the resource
Antislavery movements--United States--History--19th century
Women abolitionists--Massachusetts--Boston--19th century--Correspondence
Antislavery movements--United States
Women abolitionists--United States
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865
Weston, Deborah, b. 1814
Hesse, Augustus, d. 1867
Description
An account of the resource
Letter from Augustus Hesse, Fort Ramsay at Upton's hill, Va., to Deborah Weston, December the 19th, 1862
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Hesse, Augustus, d. 1867
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
https://ark.digitalcommonwealth.org/ark:/50959/qz20tw35g
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
December 19, 1862
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
No known copyright restrictions.
No known restrictions on use.
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
Letters/Correspondence
Manuscripts
Language
A language of the resource
English
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
Letter from Augustus Hesse from Fort Ramsay to Deborah Weston
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Diaries and Letters
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Augustus Hesse has received the box sent to him by Miss Deborah Weston. He thanks Mrs. Weston for the tea and sugar. The weather has changed to winter. It snowed four inches, then cleared at the time of the eclipse of the moon, and became very cold. They have been busy building a stable for the horses and staking their tents. They have a fireplace in the tent, with a chimney in the rear, but not quite finished. Augustus Hesse was promoted to the rank of corporal.
In the postscript on page four of this manuscript, Augustus Hesse thanks Deborah Weston for enclosing a stamp. He said: "I can't buy none for it got not a cent of mony [sic] in my possession. We dit [did] not get our pay yet but the List is giving [given] in a month ago!
Original Format
The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data
letter
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Augustus Hesse Letter
Subject
The topic of the resource
Antislavery movements--United States--History--19th century
Women abolitionists--Massachusetts--Boston--19th century--Correspondence
Antislavery movements--United States
Women abolitionists--United States
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865
Weston, Deborah, b. 1814
Hesse, Augustus, d. 1867
Description
An account of the resource
Letter from Augustus Hesse, Fort Ramsay at Upton's hill, Va., to Deborah Weston, December the 19th, 1862
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Hesse, Augustus, d. 1867
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
https://ark.digitalcommonwealth.org/ark:/50959/qz20tw35g
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Boston Public Library
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
December 19, 1862
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
No known copyright restrictions.
No known restrictions on use.
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
Letters/Correspondence
Manuscripts
Language
A language of the resource
English
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
Letter from Augustus Hesse from Fort Ramsay to Deborah Weston
Augustus Hesse
Deborah Weston
Fort Ramsay
Upton's Hill
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/492ebe038eb3ada2851dc9694ab0186d.JPG
fbeac485eb82e1ea62ec6ce7378ab061
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/a914e6d4845b191519ca2c250a963d69.JPG
9c286b2eacb04329e8add2d6a501958e
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Photographs
Still Image
A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Skirmish Drill
Subject
The topic of the resource
Soldiers drilling
Description
An account of the resource
Union soldiers on the field practicing skirmish drill
skirmish drill
training
Union soldiers
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/cc3bae5d193dcbe2bc492326cde57019.jpg
b24a4817f9aac34a0577d3da8e874856
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/af313db2877b38561c5d51b95f5359c4.pdf
cb57a4205b949ccb7beae7c1320ba04e
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Newspaper Articles
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
FIRING UPON THE PICKETS. During several days past, oar pickets stationed in the vicinity bf Ball's Cross Roads have suffered much from shots fired by concealed rebels, and who seemed to be fully informed of the situation of our men. The belief prevailed in our camps that this information was furnished by a family named Miner, whose house was situated near our outposts. Yesterday evening, when Uasil Hall's and half a dozen other houses in the vicinity were burned by the rebels, Miner's was spared. This morning Mixer, his wife", mother, three daughters and six ne. groes, were arrested y our troops and brought to the city. Mixer professed the utmost loyalty, denying the allegations, and announcing his willingness to take the oiith of allegiance. This was administered, and he was released upon his parole that he v ould not attempt to leave Washington without permission. A Methodist minister named Coi, who was arrested at Mixer's hous objected to taking the oath, and he was committed to jail. i - . . ' MORE ECEFB IOXISTS ATtRXSTEO. A company from each of Gen. Sickles' five reg: iments, in jjMaryland, under command of Lieut. -Col. Potte, of the Second Regiment, have succeeded in arresting seven . Secessionists, among whom was Capt. Stewart, who had raised a regiment of rebel cavalry, obtaining possession of the roll of the! company ; a man named Mariott, who has beien one of the parties who have kept the communication between the rebels" of Maryland with ttose of Virginia ; two of his employes, and othersi They got also a quantity of arms and ammunition. diecocrtesy to the erexch legation. During the absence of the Secretaryof State, Mr. de Gouferoy, ' First Secretary of the French Legation, politely applied to the Chief Clerk, Mr. Hunter, for a permission to put a vessel from the French Squadron into the New-York Navy-yard for repairs. Mr; Hunter took upon himself to refuse what we are sure our Government would have cheerfully permitted. the intended reception- or the prince or JOINTILLE. It was the English Legation who suggested the attempted noisy reception of the Trince of Join-ville. DISPATCH TO THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. I W Asms gton, Saturday, Aug. 14. The advance of a large reconnoiterlng force of the Confederate troops in the neighborhood of Ball's Cross-Roads, and the destruction of property of known Union men were renewed this morning. They drove In our pickets' to within half a mile of the Roads, so as to get possession of a house occupied by ft colored; man named Liau Bennxtt, which they burned to the ground. Bssmit and his wife were captured two weeks ago and taken South. The names of those who have suffered by the torch of the enemy are Basil Hall, whose house is located a mile and a quarter to the right of the Cross-Roads. Everything perishable belonging to him was destroyed,; excepting six cows, which our troops succeeded in ; bringing away this morning. Jlr. Hall's loss is WXtO. This house has been alternately occupied by the Confederate pickets and urwn. Mr. Hall says that he had previously suf ferea very much from, the destruction of his furniture by the Detuib Regiment of New-fork, for which he has made rut a bill of damages against the -Government. Messrs. ;Vjrurm "and Thomas and' Saitoh, Bcbcb also sufit red bv the fire the , conflagration being eAteded to all known Union men. TU dwelling of,, Hon. Cj H. X'fros is spared." The Confederates occupy It, and have a large Torce in, that vicinity The position o affairs at Munson's Hill remains uncharged. No targe force is visiole from this side of the intrenchrnf nts. i r' In a slirmlsh !ast nrght near Ball's Cross Roads.U is feared a Lie j tenant ia the Third Vermont Regiment, and three privates in the Ninth Massachusetts Regiment were taken prisoners, as they are missing. 5 From a prominent position on the Virginia side of the rive toUsy a jdens volume of smoke was seen ascending lin the direction of Fairfax Cnurt House,' the Confederates evidently burning the woods in that direction around their fortifications. . :1 , ' ; y ,; ' Nearly aH the , regiments In the neighborhood of Arlington Heights and the Chain Bridge were oat de anas! dtuiaa; all last night ' Z, . V' M r The artillery practice Is daily continued at lhft forts.--; r- t :,-..t,u.. . ; J. 4 The Lincoln Cavalry composed of two con;panle frem Pennsylvania, ne front Miigan, and nln frcn New.York,iis bow thoroughly orgauixed, the; Seld and staff oCrs hartng beea swora In, as foU tows : Cot McRtTu.s, Lleut-CoL' Von ScWkfsss, formerly of the Frisian Army j Majors,' C. H. O vie, late of the regiUat Army of Dragoons . A. WalJuuisI who raised two companies la Ne w-Vork, and Auguste Howard, formerly of the Prud i. . i,..t j, v i7-iuik ; ynartennastsr, O.TI Bai ley, formerly of the MlcbiraB, and Chaplain RaleWI i ; f j . " ' i
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Firing Upon the Pickets
Subject
The topic of the resource
Military engagement in Arlington 's Ball's Crossroads vicinity
Description
An account of the resource
Skirmish that took place at Hall;s Hill
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
New York TImes
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Newspapers.com
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
New York Times
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
September 15, 1861
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Public Domain
Ball's Crossroads
Hall's Hill
Pickets
Skirmish
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/4aeb1032d222e912a206c9bc2a6e40c3.gif
daff620e749fd914c273ce74f813a7e9
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Photographs
Still Image
A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Major William M. Gregg of the 23rd New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment
Subject
The topic of the resource
23rd New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment
Description
An account of the resource
Portrait of Union Major William M. Gregg of the 23rd New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment Posing in a Tent During the Civil War
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Mathew Brady
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Library of Congress
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1861
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Public Domain
1860's
23rd New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment
american civil war
animated
cigar
desk
glass negative
major
smoking
stereograph
stereoscopic
tent
union camp
union officer
william gregg
writing
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/b869f49e70cf709a8cdc43c4579b96a5.pdf
087ae2e36681a490148c9500152c3faf
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Books
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
University of Virginia Press
Chapter Title: Abolitionism as Logical Conclusion: General James S. Wadsworth as a Case Study in Anti-Southern Sentiment and the Radicalizing Experience of the Civil War
Chapter Author(s): Judith A. Hunter
Book Title: The Struggle for Equality
Book Subtitle: Essays on Sectional Conflict, the Civil War, and the Long Reconstruction
Book Editor(s): Orville Vernon Burton, Jerald Podair, Jennifer L. Weber
Published by: University of Virginia Press. (2011)
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wrmq5.6
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a widerange of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity andfacilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available athttps://about.jstor.org/terms
University of Virginia Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to The Struggle for Equality
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Abolitionism as Logical Conclusion
General James S. Wadsworth as a Case Study
in Anti-Southern Sentiment and the Radicalizing
Experience of the Civil War
E E E
Judith A. Hunter
When James S. Wadsworth, a prominent Union general well-known for
his military exploits, his politics, and his background, died after the
battle of the Wilderness in 1864, it moved a North that had seen all too many
deaths. In fact, John Hay remarked that Abraham Lincoln felt the loss of
Wadsworth keenly:
I have not known the President so a√ected by a personal loss since the death
of [Colonel Edward D.] Baker, as by the death of General Wadsworth. . . .
[Lincoln said that] no man has given himself up to the war with such selfsacrificing
patriotism as Gen. Wadsworth. He went into the service not wishing
or expecting great success or distinction in his military career and profoundly
indi√erent to popular applause, actuated only by a sense of duty
which he neither evaded nor sought to evade.∞
Lincoln’s respect and the public’s acclaim for Wadsworth were shaped in
large part by the fact that he had immediately volunteered for the war, leaving
behind an enormous agricultural empire in western New York, serving without
pay, and volunteering to start as close to the bottom as a prominent man in
his fifties could, as a major. Quickly promoted to brigadier general for both his
service at Bull Run and his eminence in New York politics, Wadsworth was
passionate in his defense of the Union and his opposition to slavery.≤ However,
his abolitionist feelings were an endpoint in a long process, one that
modern biographers have not examined. It was a process that is illustrative of
how feelings about slavery in the North gradually changed and hardened in
response to events, especially the experience of the Civil War itself.
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
30 Judith A. Hunter
Because Wadsworth’s endpoint was as a member of the faction of the
Republican Party known as the Radicals, it has been tempting for scholars to
assume that he always had radical positions on the subject of slavery. Yet that
characterization does not accurately describe Wadsworth’s beliefs for most of
his life. Although he left scant records to examine, those that survive show no
concern for the condition of slaves or indignation at the immorality of slavery
until after the war had begun. Wadsworth had had a long political career in
the antebellum period, and what prompted him to speak out in the 1840s and
1850s was not so much slavery as ‘‘the slave power.’’ Wadsworth became
convinced, as did many Northerners during the antebellum period, that a
cabal of powerful proslavery Southerners was endangering the freedoms and
very existence of the republic in their zeal to protect and promote the institution
of slavery. This conviction, more than concern about slavery’s iniquity,
was his main motivation.≥
The first event to goad James Wadsworth toward antislavery had more to
do with political infighting among Democrats than anything else. Although
his father, the founder of the family fortune and his hometown, was, unsurprisingly,
a Whig, James S. Wadsworth’s earliest known political allegiances
were to the Democrats and to Martin Van Buren. He was outraged
when Martin Van Buren was, as the young Wadsworth saw it, cheated out of
the Democratic nomination in 1844. Instead, the Democrats chose James K.
Polk, primarily because Van Buren had come out against the annexation of
Texas (which, all sides assumed, would add vast new slave territories to the
United States and provoke war with Mexico). Wadsworth wrote a livid letter
to the former president after the nominating convention: ‘‘I have seen no full
account of the debates, but I do not perceive that the dictation and selfishness
of the South were properly rebuked. They have filled the Executive Chair 44
years, the North 12, and yet because we are not prepared to embark in a most
unjust and iniquitous war to extend their ‘Institutions’—meaning Slavery—
our rights are again to be deferred.’’∂
Had Wadsworth’s primary political concerns revolved around slavery at
this point, he could have supported the third-party candidacy of the Liberty
Party’s James G. Birney, who garnered enough votes in western New York to
help throw the state into Polk’s column in the 1844 election. There is no
record of Wadsworth’s having done so. In fact, he expressed approval of Polk
as vice-presidential material in the same letter to Van Buren, saying, ‘‘I have a
favourable opinion of Mr. Polk and hoped to have seen him nominated, but
not where he is.’’ Antiquarian accounts suggest Wadsworth became reconciled
enough to Polk to support his presidential candidacy and place wagers
on his victory.Σ
A sense of outraged honor, in this case that Van Buren had been unfairly
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Abolitionism as Logical Conclusion 31
deprived of the Democratic presidential nomination by scheming Southerners,
often seemed to motivate Wadsworth to take his strongest political
positions. He was not at all typical of most of the Van Buren supporters who
split from the New York Democracy. Jonathan Earle’s careful examination of
Northern Democrats who pushed for the limitation of slavery to its existing
boundaries (‘‘Free Soilers’’) demonstrates that Van Buren’s defenders in New
York typically came from a very di√erent background than James Wadsworth
did. They tended to come from rural areas that were economically stagnant
and isolated; he finds them to have been outside the economically, politically,
socially, and religiously fertile area of upstate New York historians refer to
as the ‘‘burned-over district.’’ Although there is no evidence that suggests
Wadsworth took part in the religious or social ‘‘enthusiasms’’ of his region,
they surrounded him in the prosperous Genesee Valley, a part of the burnedover
district. His great wealth and its source were also unusual for the ‘‘Barnburners’’
(New York Democrats who bolted their party to remain loyal to Van
Buren). Earle finds that many of them were involved in the antirent agitations
against large landholders that characterized rural New York in this period, so
Wadsworth’s role as a land baron made him a most anomalous Barnburner.Π
Henry B. Stanton recounts an anecdote in his memoirs about Wadsworth’s
activities as a Barnburner that strongly hints that Wadsworth was
chiefly motivated by his feelings of indignation rather than an ideological
position on slavery. Bitter recriminations between the Barnburners and their
rivals, the ‘‘Hunkers,’’ marked the 1847 New York Democratic convention in
Syracuse. The Hunkers’ treatment the previous year of Silas Wright, the
unsuccessful Barnburner candidate for governor, had angered Wadsworth’s
faction. Wright’s death just a short time later increased the bitter feelings. As
Stanton recalled, James Wadsworth dramatically and physically let everyone
know whom he held responsible for their leader’s demise: ‘‘In the convention
some one spoke of doing justice to Silas Wright. A Hunker sneeringly responded,
‘It is too late; he is dead.’ Springing upon a table, Wadsworth made
the hall ring as he uttered a defiant reply: ‘Though it may be too late to do
justice to Silas Wright, it is not too late to do justice to his assassins.’ ’’π
The slight to Van Buren ended up permanently dividing New York Democrats,
who had di≈culty working together from that point. The Barnburners,
Wadsworth’s faction, bolted the 1848 Democratic national convention
over the Wilmot Proviso (a free soil measure they supported and the national
party did not) and spurned the nominee, Lewis Cass, in favor of Van Buren,
whom they helped to put at the head of the third-party Free Soil ticket.
Wadsworth’s public statements on the issue prompted the Maryland politician
Francis Preston Blair to write him approvingly, commending him for
avoiding even the appearance of abolitionism: ‘‘You make an admirable dis-
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
32 Judith A. Hunter
tinction when you point the attention to the fact that the true Democrats of
the country aim to extend its prosperity by providing for the white race, whilst
abolitionism is only concerned for the black.’’ Blair continued in a vein that
made it clear that he did not consider James Wadsworth to be a radical in any
way on the subject of slavery: ‘‘The truth is that the abolitionists and the
slave propaganders [sic] are much nearer allies in their sympathies than we
with either. They are both Negro lovers—the first because they are political
property—the second because they are personal property.’’∫
Another strong indication that James Wadsworth was not deeply and
personally concerned with actual slaves, rather than the expansion of slavery,
comes from his philanthropic activity during the antebellum period. Wadsworth
was renowned for his support of charitable causes. For instance, during
the height of the Irish potato famine, he provided a full shipload of grain to
the famine relief e√ort. In the 1850s he donated sums of three to five thousand
dollars annually to benevolent organizations. Yet Wadsworth was noticeably
inactive in funding antislavery e√orts. The only exceptions were fifty dollars
he contributed toward the fines levied against a fugitive slave in Wisconsin in
1855 and a fairly mysterious reference to his providing financial support to the
Underground Railroad in the Albany area in an Albany activist’s letter.Ω
Although Wadsworth and the rest of the Barnburners temporarily reentered
the Democratic fold after 1848, they left it permanently following the
Kansas-Nebraska Act. Wadsworth presided over a ‘‘Democratic-Republican
Convention’’ in July of 1856 at Syracuse, the result of which was the final
transfer of the Barnburners into the new Republican Party. Wadsworth came
close to the Republican gubernatorial nomination that year. All of these
activities would be consistent with Wadsworth’s free soil principles and his
frustration with what he saw as Southern domination of the federal government
(and his former party).∞≠
As the sectional crisis deepened in the immediate aftermath of Abraham
Lincoln’s election as president in 1860, the governor of New York appointed
James Wadsworth one of New York’s delegates to the peace conference that
met that winter in Washington in an attempt to avert civil war. The New
Yorker heard nothing as a member of the Peace Convention of 1861 that
softened his views of Southern leadership, and he refused to compromise on
the issue of slavery’s extension. L. E. Chittenden, a delegate from Vermont,
later recalled an outburst by Wadsworth, who was furious at what he saw as
Southern bad faith at the convention. According to Chittenden, the New
Yorker demanded of a Virginian delegate, ‘‘Why do you persist in your attempt
to deceive the North? You secessionists mean fight! You will keep right
on with your treasonable schemes until you either whip us or we discipline
you.’’ Although he had given up any hopes for the convention’s success,
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Abolitionism as Logical Conclusion 33
Wadsworth went on to say that he would stick it out in Washington until its
conclusion: ‘‘I shall stay here until Congress adjourns on the 3d of March,
because I cannot honorably resign from the Conference. Then I shall go
home and help my people to get ready for the war in which you slaveholders
intend to involve the republic!’’∞∞
Wadsworth was certainly willing to fight, but he wanted to fight slaveholders
rather than slavery when the war began. Indeed, one of the most
explicit statements Wadsworth made on his feelings about slavery prior to the
war makes it clear that abolition was further than he was prepared to go.
In testimony to the American Freedman’s Inquiry Commission only a few
months before he died, Wadsworth claimed, ‘‘At the beginning of the war, I
was hardly a Republican. I thought slavery should be restricted to the ground
where it stood, but was opposed to interfering with it there. I dreaded insurrections,
massacres, and violence.’’∞≤
Yet it is apparent that James Wadsworth’s participation in the Civil War
reassured him on that score, so that he quickly became a champion of emancipation,
the ‘‘radical’’ position. Enlisting in the Union e√ort at the rank of
major, Wadsworth saw action at Bull Run, the first full battle of the war. After
acquitting himself admirably in the fight as a volunteer aide to the commanding
general, Irvin McDowell, Wadsworth won quick promotion to the rank
of brigadier general. Obviously, his eminence and political status were large
factors in his elevation, but Wadsworth worked diligently to be worthy of
command. During the long winter of 1861–62, when the public chafed because
the Army of the Potomac did not go on the o√ensive, Wadsworth and
his brigade were stationed at Upton’s Hill, the closest point on the Union
lines to the rebel army. There, he strove to protect the welfare of his men, but
he also became concerned for the welfare of individual slaves who came to his
attention. Some Virginian owners who had fled the Union occupation of
their region had abandoned their chattel. Wadsworth wrote to Charles Sumner,
the Republican senator from Massachusetts who was well-known for his
antislavery views, to secure his help in getting three or four families who were
‘‘practically emancipated’’ safely north. Ignoring his technical obligation to
return such ‘‘property’’ to their owners (the Fugitive Slave Law was still in
e√ect), Wadsworth helped other slaves by employing them in his camp.
No longer a faraway abstraction, slaves became an everyday presence whom
Wadsworth treated with his customary charity and pragmatism.∞≥
That pragmatic approach also caused Wadsworth to come to appreciate
the slaves he met as valuable sources of intelligence. He interviewed as many
of them as he could about the strength of the enemy forces in nearby Centerville
and Manassas, getting consistent enough answers that he became very
confident in his estimate of the size of the Confederate army, which he, along
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
34 Judith A. Hunter
with many other frustrated Northerners, was eager to attack. As he would
testify to Congress, ‘‘I think we are largely superior to our enemies in numbers.’’
This testimony clearly aligned Wadsworth with Republicans upset
with the overall command and approach of General George B. McClellan, a
known conservative on slavery. However, it may very well be that Wadsworth
joined the radicals’ opposition to McClellan’s policies out of personal experience
as much as political conviction. During the long period after Bull Run in
which the Army of the Potomac failed to move on the enemy, McClellan
repeatedly insisted that his army could not attack because they faced such
a huge opposing force. Wadsworth’s intelligence activities, which included
scouting and interviewing prisoners as well as refugee slaves, led him to
conclude they only faced somewhere between 40,000 and 50,000 men. He
reported this estimate up the chain of command, only to have his commander,
who was sure that the Confederates’ strength was closer to 150,000 men,
rudely dismiss Wadsworth’s conclusions. As later events showed that the
correct number was within five hundred of Wadsworth’s estimate, it is not
surprising that Wadsworth’s attitude toward McClellan became one of suspicion.∞∂
The well-known conflict between Wadsworth and McClellan in the
spring of 1862 over the number of troops left to defend Washington during
the Peninsula Campaign needs to be interpreted with the dispute of the
previous winter in mind, when Wadsworth learned to doubt McClellan’s
wisdom and judgment.
Indeed, personality issues need to be taken into account in tracing Wadsworth’s
growing radicalism, as James Wadsworth defined himself as being in
opposition to others besides ‘‘Little Mac.’’ It was a repeated pattern. Much as
his activities as a Free Soil Democrat were due to his conflict with those who
betrayed Martin Van Buren, the divisions that existed in his new party between
former Democrats and former Whigs must have influenced many of his
activities as a Republican. Wadsworth was a New York Republican who began
as a Democrat, and his relations with former Whigs in the New York party
were not always smooth. Since William Seward, the leader of that faction, was
a leading moderate in his position as Lincoln’s secretary of state, Wadsworth
may have instinctively avoided that camp. In fact, Wadsworth had actively
worked against Seward’s getting the Republican nomination in 1860, helping
to undermine the expected nominee’s viability by asserting Seward would not
be able to carry New York in the general election. Wadsworth and Seward
would hardly be inclined to become close allies once the war began.∞Σ
General Wadsworth clashed with General McClellan over his concerns
about the capital when the Army of the Potomac finally began to leave
Washington for the Peninsula Campaign because Wadsworth was now responsible
for the capital’s safety. Lincoln had appointed Wadsworth military
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Abolitionism as Logical Conclusion 35
governor of the District of Columbia when he reorganized the Federal army
in March of 1862. In this capacity, Wadsworth found that he had to deal with
the legal and practical issues that immediately arose as ‘‘contrabands,’’ enemy
property in the form of slaves, showed up in Washington. At that point the
Fugitive Slave Act still bound the national government, and the Constitution
forced it to return ‘‘property’’ to owners, many of whom appealed to the
government for help in getting back their slaves. This was an awkward issue
for the Lincoln administration, particularly with Maryland slaveholders,
whose state was so important to Lincoln’s border state policies. Wadsworth
insisted that contrabands whose owners he determined to be disloyal were
under his jurisdiction, and he issued each written certificates of military
protection. But the civil authorities (usually Lincoln’s friend Marshal Ward
Lamon) disagreed and on several occasions jailed such fugitives. Wadsworth
was continually involved in bureaucratic and legal disputes on this issue, and
once he actually ordered soldiers to the jail in the middle of the night to free
all the imprisoned contrabands. The general was also responsible to some
degree for the feeding, shelter, and employment of the great numbers of
fugitive slaves in the District of Columbia, another experience that must have
helped shape his feelings on abolition. He gained a reputation as their advocate
and protector. Adam Gurowski, a Polish diarist who seemed to exist to
pass judgment on the important players in Civil War–era Washington, was
an unabashed admirer of Wadsworth’s actions (which he exaggerated as he
praised): ‘‘General Wadsworth is the good genius of the poor and oppressed
race. But for Wadsworth’s noble soul and heart the Lamons and many other
blood-hounds in Washington would have given about three-fourths of the
fugitives over to the whip of the slavers.’’∞Π
One tantalizing anecdote survives that suggests Wadsworth felt great
frustration with Lincoln’s slow movement on the issue of slavery during the
early period of the war. Adams S. Hill, a New York Tribune reporter, wrote to
his editor an account of a conversation he had one evening in July of 1862 with
the general: ‘‘He is cheerful in view of military prospects, but thinks political
signs gloomy. . . . He says that the President is not with us; has no Antislavery
instincts. He has never heard him speak of Anti-slavery men, otherwise
than as ‘radicals,’ ‘abolitionists,’ and of the ‘nigger question’ he frequently
speaks.’’ In fact, Wadsworth predicted ‘‘that if emancipation comes at all it
will be from the rebels, or in consequence of their protracting this war.’’
Although Hill never included the disgruntled New Yorker’s assessment in a
story, he nevertheless gave it great credence: ‘‘I value his testimony because he
has, as he says, been with the President and Stanton [the secretary of war]
every day at the War Department—frequently for five or six hours—during
several months.’’∞π
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
36 Judith A. Hunter
His experiences with fugitives seem to have given Wadsworth a spur toward
outright abolitionism, and he was relieved when Lincoln finally did
make his move against slavery with his Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation.
Yet it was his anti-Southern feelings, not any concern for African Americans,
that Wadsworth publicly spoke and wrote about when he addressed the
issue of emancipation. The New York Republicans nominated James Wadsworth
for governor in 1862, and he agreed to stand but remained serving in his
post in Washington. This arrangement meant he did little active campaigning;
when he did, he justified abolition as a means to preserve the union and punish
the South, not as an end in and of itself. He gave only one speech in New York
during the campaign, an address to a mass meeting at Cooper Union a few
days before the election, and in it he responded to Democrats’ criticisms of
Lincoln’s new emancipation policy, announced the previous month:
Mr. Lincoln has told you that he would save this country with slavery if he
could, and he would save it without slavery if he could; he has never said to
you that if he could not save slavery he would let the country go. . . . He has
said to those in rebellion against the United States: ‘‘I give you 100 days to
return to your allegiance; if you fail to do that, I will strike from under you
that institution which some of you seem to think dearer than life, than liberty,
than country, than peace.’’ . . . Gentlemen, I stand by Abraham Lincoln.
[Tremendous applause.] It is just, it is holy so to do.∞∫
Although it would be politically prudent to omit any concern for the
injustice of slavery when speaking to voters of a city that would see horrific
race riots within a year, prudence was not a quality Wadsworth possessed. In
the same speech he at last embraced the label ‘‘abolitionist’’ for the first time.
Finally reaching this conclusion was consistent with his sense of honor and
his sense of where the slave power and the war had brought the nation.
I know, for I have sometimes felt, the influence of the odium which the
spurious aristocracy, who have so largely directed the destinies of this nation
for three-quarters of a century, have attached to the word ‘‘abolition.’’ They
have treated it, and too often taught us to treat it, as some low, vulgar crime,
not to be spoken of in good society or mentioned in fashionable parlors. I
know there are many men still influenced by this prejudice; but let those who,
in this hour of peril, this struggle of life and death, shrink from that odium
stand aside. The events of this hour are too big for them.∞Ω
In the end, Wadsworth lost the race by fewer than eleven thousand votes,
despite many handicaps. He was almost totally absent from the hustings. The
absence of New York soldiers at the front (a significant potential voting bloc
in his favor) must have harmed his chances even more, as did the fact that
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Abolitionism as Logical Conclusion 37
McClellan refused to use the Army of the Potomac to follow up on the
victory at Antietam. Finally, the lack of real support from New York kingmakers
William Seward and Thurlow Weed was likely the most important
blow. Gideon Welles, Lincoln’s secretary of the navy, recalled in his diary the
fatal New York infighting that had defeated Wadsworth when he lamented
his death in 1864: ‘‘He should, by good right and fair-dealing, have been at
this moment Governor of New York, but the perfidy of Thurlow Weed and
others defeated him. I have always believed that Seward was, if not implicated,
a sympathizer in that business.’’≤≠
James Wadsworth finally converted to abolitionism because he saw it as an
e√ective war measure. As he told supporters who came to see him shortly
after his nomination,
I have never failed, gentlemen, previous to the outbreak of this rebellion . . . to
declare my earnest devotion to the Constitution of the United States, and my
desire to uphold it, with what are called compromises and concessions on
behalf of Slavery. But, gentlemen, Secession and War, bloody and relentless
war, have changed our relations to that which is the cause and the source of
the war. . . . We have the right, we are bound, moreover, by the most solemn
obligations of duty, to use this agency [emancipation], so far as we can, to put
an end to this struggle, and to save the lives of white men who are perishing by
thousands in this country.
Unfortunately for his political career, Wadsworth came to accept this fact
before the bulk of the Northern electorate did (1862 was a poor year for many
Republican candidates). Yet the argument that emancipation diminished the
Southern capacity to wage rebellion ultimately did largely win over skeptical
Northern opinion. They simply did not arrive at that point as quickly as
Wadsworth did.≤∞
The anger at the South that prodded James S. Wadsworth along the path
to abolitionism, though, creates a paradox. In his Washington speech, the
general-turned-candidate touched on a theme that was a constant refrain in
his wartime correspondence:
How long are we to bear the insolence of this Southern aristocracy? Have we
not borne it long enough? Has it not long enough disturbed and distracted
our councils, and paralyzed our energies? Has it not long enough paralyzed
the energies of the country? Nay, more, has it not long enough, in the eyes of
the other civilized nations of the world, covered us with infamy?
Wadsworth used the term ‘‘aristocracy’’ with real distaste here and elsewhere,
yet there were few Americans with a more aristocratic pedigree than
his. Besides his great wealth and illustrious ancestry, one fact from his biogra-
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
38 Judith A. Hunter
phy that goes far to prove his own qualifications as an aristocrat would be that
he built his impressive home, Hartford House, after he returned from his
multiyear honeymoon abroad, exactly on the plans of the estate of Britain’s
Lord Hertford, which he and his wife had visited and admired. Yet his zeal
for the war e√ort and his support for abolition rested on republican distaste
for the South’s slave-owning class. Wadsworth followed his questions about
those Southerner aristocrats to his Washington supporters with the statement,
‘‘We are in the pangs of dissolution, or we are in the pangs of exorcism.
If we would save ourselves, we must cast out the devil which has tormented
and disgraced us from the hour of our national birth.’’ To James S. Wadsworth
the devil was not slavery; it was the aristocracy of the South. Because
abolition would prevent the Southern aristocracy from ever endangering the
nation again, Wadsworth ended his life as an avowed abolitionist.≤≤
Notes
1. John Hay, Lincoln and the Civil War in the Diaries and Letters of John Hay, ed.
Tyler Dennett (New York: Dodd, Mead, and Co., 1939; reprint, New York: Da Capo
Press, 1988), 182.
2. James Wadsworth has been the subject of three biographies, none of which
analyzes his changing politics: Henry Greenleaf Pearson, James S. Wadsworth of Geneseo:
Brevet Major-General, U.S.V. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1913); John F.
Krumwiede, ‘‘Old Waddy’s Coming’’: The Military Career of Brigadier General James S.
Wadsworth, Army of the Potomac Series (Baltimore: Butternut and Blue, 2002);
Wayne Mahood, General Wadsworth: The Life and Times of Brevet Major General
James S. Wadsworth (Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 2003).
3. The concept of the ‘‘slave power’’ is best set out in David Brion Davis, The Slave
Power Conspiracy and the Paranoid Style (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University
Press, 1969). One could make a fascinating comparison between Wadsworth’s antislavery
career and that of a true radical on the subject, Gerrit Smith’s. Both men had
immense fortunes in upstate New York real estate (Wadsworth in the Genesee Valley
and Smith’s in the Utica area), and both men ended up as abolitionists. Yet Smith was
a vital leader of the ‘‘burned-over district’s’’ antislavery movement from the 1830s,
active in the single-issue Liberty Party (and elected to Congress), and he ultimately
went so far in his e√orts to eradicate slavery that he provided financial support for
John Brown’s raid on Harper’s Ferry. See Ralph Volney Harlow, Gerrit Smith: Philanthropist
and Reformer (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1939; reprint, New
York: Russell and Russell, 1972). Wadsworth never got near to the abolitionist wing of
the antislavery spectrum before the Civil War.
4. James S. Wadsworth to Martin Van Buren, June 1, 1844, Presidential Papers
Microfilm, Martin Van Martin Buren Papers, Series 2: 1844 May 30 to 1845 May 7, reel
29; Pearson, James S. Wadsworth of Geneseo, 35–37; Michael F. Holt, The Fate of Their
Country: Politicians, Slavery Extension, and the Coming of the Civil War (New York:
Hill and Wang, 2004), 11.
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Abolitionism as Logical Conclusion 39
5. Wadsworth to Van Buren, June 1, 1844; Mahood, General Wadsworth, 46; Lockwood
L. Doty, A History of Livingston County, New York: From Its Earliest Traditions,
to Its Part in the War for Our Union (Geneseo, NY: Edward E. Doty, 1876), 528. In a
truly ironic footnote, Birney ended up being reinterred by his wife alongside other
members of her family in a small cemetery just down the road from Wadsworth’s
birthplace in Geneseo. Betty Fladeland, James Gillespie Birney: Slaveholder to Abolitionist
(Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1955), 293n.
6. Jonathan H. Earle, Jacksonian Antislavery and the Politics of Free Soil, 1824–1854
(Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004), chap. 2. The best overview
of the ‘‘burned-over district’’ of New York remains Whitney Cross, The Burned-Over
District: The Social and Intellectual History of Enthusiastic Religion in Western New
York, 1800–1850 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1950). Cross, however, does not
include Wadsworth’s Livingston County in his discussion, as he feels the role of
Wadsworth and his father as landlord for so much of the county made it di√erent
from other areas he discusses. Yet work that has been done on Livingston County
since the publication of Cross’s work suggests that it was very much like the rest of the
burned-over district. For example, Virginia Nestlen finds that the local Presbyterian
church experienced a significant revival episode: see Virginia Nestlen, ‘‘Revival in
1825: The Role of the Wadsworth Family in Geneseo’’ (honors thesis, State University
of New York at Geneseo, 1998).
7. Henry B. Stanton, Random Recollections (New York: Harper and Brothers,
1887), 160; John Niven, Martin Van Buren: The Romantic Age of American Politics (New
York: Oxford University Press, 1983), 574.
8. Pearson, James S. Wadsworth of Geneseo, 40–42; Francis Preston Blair to James
S. Wadsworth, June 28, 1848, Wadsworth Family Papers, Library of Congress, Washington,
DC.
9. Pearson, James S. Wadsworth of Geneseo, 29; Frank A. Abial, History of the
Republican Party, Embracing Its Origin, Growth and Mission (Springfield, IL: Union
Publishing Company, 1884), 126; Tom Carlaco, The Underground Railroad in the
Adirondack Region ( Je√erson, NC: McFarland and Company, 2004), 191.
10. Pearson, James S. Wadsworth of Geneseo, 45–47.
11. Mahood, General Wadsworth, 58–59; L. E. Chittenden, Personal Reminiscences,
1840–1890 (New York: Richmond, Croscup and Co., 1893), 303.
12. ‘‘Testimony of a War Department Special Inspector,’’ in Ira Berlin et al., eds.,
The Wartime Genesis of Free Labor: The Lower South, Freedom: A Documentary
History of Emancipation 1861–1867, series 1, vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1990), 492.
13. Pearson, James S. Wadsworth of Geneseo, 95–97; Mahood, General Wadsworth,
69–74.
14. Pearson, James S. Wadsworth of Geneseo, 97, 99, 101, 104, 105; Edwin C. Fishel,
The Secret War for the Union: The Untold Story of Military Intelligence in the Civil
War (Boston: Houghton MiΔin Company, 1996), 112, 113, 129; James M. McPherson,
Ordeal by Fire: The Civil War and Reconstruction (New York: Alfred A. Knopf,
1982), 212.
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
40 Judith A. Hunter
15. Eric Foner, Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party
before the Civil War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970), 182.
16. Pearson, James S. Wadsworth of Geneseo, 46, 48, 134–41; Margaret Leech,
Reveille in Washington, 1860–1865 (New York: Harper and Brother Publishers, 1941),
247; Don E. Fehrenbacher, The Slaveholding Republic: An Account of the United States
Government’s Relations to Slavery, ed. Ward M. McAfee (New York: Oxford University
Press, 2001), 249; Allen C. Guelzo, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The
End of Slavery in America (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2004), 89–90; Adam
Gurowski, Diary from March 4, 1861 to November 12, 1862 (Boston: Lee and Shepard,
1862), 246.
17. Adams S. Hill to Sydney Howard Gay, quoted in James Ford Rhodes, History
of the United States from the Compromise of 1850 to the Final Restoration of Home Rule at
the South in 1877, vol. 4, 1862–1864 (New York: Macmillan Company, 1913), 64n.
Rhodes indicates that he is quoting ‘‘private correspondence which has been kindly
placed at my disposal by Professor Hill.’’
18. Speech of James S. Wadsworth at the Cooper Union, New York City, Oct. 30,
1862, ‘‘compiled from the reports in New York papers of October 31’’ and reprinted in
Pearson, James S. Wadsworth of Geneseo, 158–63, quotation on 160.
19. Ibid.
20. Ibid., 158–63, quotation on 160; Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles, 3 vols.
(Boston: Houghton and MiΔin Company, 1911), 2:27. For an overview of the 1862
gubernatorial race, see Stewart Mitchell, Horatio Seymour of New York (Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1938), chap. 12; Mahood, General Wadsworth, chap. 11;
Pearson, James S. Wadsworth of Geneseo, chap. 5.
21. ‘‘Speech of General Wadsworth at Washington, Friday Evening, September
26, 1862,’’ Genesee Valley Collection, Milne Library, State University of New York–
Geneseo.
22. Ibid.; Mahood, General Wadsworth, 34.
This content downloaded from 129.174.21.5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:14:22 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Abolitionism as Logical Conclusion: General James S. Wadsworth as a Case Study in Anti-Southern Sentiment and the Radicalizing Experience of the Civil War
Subject
The topic of the resource
Essays on Sectional Conflict, the Civil War, and the Long Reconstruction
Description
An account of the resource
General James Wadsworth and his actions as an abolitionist and radical Republican
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Judith A. Hunter
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
JSTOR
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wrmq5.6
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
University of Virginia Press
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2011
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Public Domain
abolitionism
General James Wadsworth
Radical Republican
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/db669787a367e549eb7f46af4536d575.pdf
395b70f380f4e9ced6bcb634b437da3f
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Books
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
The following paper deals with a small part of a very large subject. It is limited in two directions, in time and in scope. It ends just as Congress was about to constitute the Joint Committee on
Reconstruction. It does not discuss the report of that committee;
much less the laws that followed. It does not even discuss the
earlier proposition in Congress, made in the form of bills for the better
governing of the seceded states, or of resolutions setting forth the
true relations between the national government and the seceding
states. Interesting and valuable, doubtless, from some points of
view, none of them were ever passed to be laws; none were ever
applied practically.
Moreover of all the various relations existing between the several
states and their citizens on the one hand and the national govern-
ment on the other, only those with the national legislative are here
discussed, and these not in full. The discussion is strictly limited to
the cases in which the respective houses of Congress judged the
qualifications of applicants for membership from the states in insur-
rection. The results are made public in the hope that they may
prove of some little interest to students of United States history
since I 86o; and in the further hope that they may prove of some
service as one introductory chapter to the study of reconstruction.
Ten times in the Senate and more than thirty times in the House
of Representatives, during the Thirty-seventh and Thirty-eighth Con-
gresses, was application made for admission by men claiming to re-
present some portion of the territory then in insurrection against the
national government. Full lists of the cases with the disposition
made of each are given in notes at the end of this article and of its
continuation respectively. The body of the papers will be limited to
an analysis of the typical cases in order to present the principles and
interests involved.
The point of view is necessarily and exclusively that of the na-
tional government. In a considerable portion of the territory over
which it held sway, its authority had of a sudden been resisted and
defied; there was rebellion, the organization of a hostile government
and attempted revolution.
(279)
This content downloaded from
71.127.57.213 on Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:58:03 UTC
All use subject to htt
2 80 F. W. Moore
Some of the states were in full possession of the hostile power
before the national government could move. Its first step was to
check the progress of secession. Maryland, Kentucky and Mis-
souri were saved after a struggle. The next step was to recover
lost ground. West Virginia had been promptly and completely re-
covered; and after a while Louisiana, Tennessee and Arkansas were
regained beyond successful military dispute. The longer and more
stubborn the resistance, the more difficult and risky the reconstruc-
tion. It is impossible to refer here to the work of the executive de-
partment of the government in reconstruction, or to describe the pro-
gress of the army and the work that was accomplished in its rear-
establishing civil order and local government, opening the courts
and starting business. Our attention must be confined to the ac-
tion of the two houses of Congress on the question of filling the
vacancies in their ranks by the admission of members from the states
and districts which had seceded.
One general remark in passing: Some of the applicants for
membership came representing districts which honestly and fully re-
pudiated secession and secessionists. In other cases the desire of
the applicant for office and the emolument thereof is more apparent
than either the desire or the worthiness of the district to be repre-
sented. These are the extreme cases; others lie between.
The chairman of the House Committee of Elections in both
Congresses was Mr. Henry Dawes (Rep.) of Massachussetts, later
senator from that state. Of the nine members, six were Republi-
cans and three Democrats, Mr. Voorhees, of Indiana, being the
leader of the minority. In the Senate Mr. Lyman Trumbull (Rep.)
of Illinois was chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, to which
all election cases were referred, with four Republican and two Demo-
cratic associates.'
When the Thirty-seventh Congress met in extra session, July 4,
i86i, four congressmen appeared from Virginia, one from the dis-
trict opposite Washington, including Alexandria, and three from the
western portion of the state, out of which the state of West Virginia
was afterwards formed. Mr. Dawes made a statement concerning
the election west of the mountains. In brief the situation was this:
In view of the near approach of the regular congressional election,
the Richmond convention forbade the election of federal congress-
men. There was no official call; but an election de facto was held
on the regular day, May 23, and was part of a movement by which
the people of the western counties were proceeding to repudiate the
I But when Jas. A. Bayard (Del., Dem.) resigned from the Senate, Jan. 29, 1864,
his place on this committee was taken by Reverdy Johnson (Md., Rep.).
This content downloaded from
71.127.57.213 on Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:58:03 UTC
All use subject to htt
Congressmen from Seceding S/ates, z86z 65 28I
action of the Richmond convention and to form ab initio a state
government composed of loyal men. The vote was taken in the
midst of much partisan excitement. But " no serious breach of the
peace occurred."' The vote was only moderately full, but the ap-
plicants received a majority of the votes cast. On this showing,
Messrs. Brown, Carlile and Whaley were admitted to represent
the tenth, eleventh and twelfth districts, respectively, and they im-
mediately qualified and took their seats.
So also did Mr. Upton, from the seventh, the Alexandria district,
whose case was not distinguished from the others at this time.
Several days later, however, a member questioned his title to a seat
and his case was referred to the Committee of Elections, which re-
ported during the long session. The question was raised whether
he was a citizen of Ohio or of Virginia at the time of his election.
But the case was decided on another point. Only a small fraction of
his district was loyal or at least able to show its loyalty. It was con-
stantly threatened by the Confederate army and part of it had been
occupied by them on the day of the alleged election. The election
was called by the secession authorities for the choice of state senator
and delegates to Richmond and was held on May 23. A docu-
ment purporting to be a copy of the poll-book of one precinct (vot-
ing in Virginia at that time was viva voce) showed that ten votes had
been recorded for the claimant for representative in the national
Congress; but no election officers, secessionist or other, certified to
its authenticity. The committee held that there was no proof that
any votes at all had been legally cast for him and that he was not
entitled to a seat. The report was opposed on the floor of the
House on the ground that it was as proper to hold an election in
this district on May 23d, as in the western districts, whose repre-
sentatives had been admitted; that the authority of the Richmond
convention should not be recognized either to prohibit or to super-
vise an election to Congress, and that it was simply a question whether
loyal votes had been polled. But this point was covered in the re-
port. The committee had inquired whether enough loyal votes had
been polled to make the election a valid one, and had agreed that to
seat him on the showing would be a bad precedent. A motion to
amend the report by confirming Mr. Upton's title to his seat was
voted down, fifty yeas to seventy-three nays (thirty-five Republicans
and fifteen Democrats to forty-nine Republicans and twenty-four
Democrats). Accordingly he was unseated, February 27, i862.
Meanwhile the movement to re-establish a loyal state government
had resulted in a popular convention at Wheeling; the convention
'Hagans's W. Va. Reports, I. 54.
This content downloaded from
71.127.57.213 on Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:58:03 UTC
All use subject to htt
282 F. W. Moore
had inaugurated a state government, including a legislature; the
legislature had met, transacted ordinary business and adjourned.
The convention, reassembling, then called an election for the choice
of representatives in congress in those districts in which none had
been chosen in May. Under this call an election was held in the
first district, as a result of whichl Mr. Segar claimed a seat. The
committee held that the convention had " no authority to act in the
presence of the legislature." It was convened for the purpose of creat-
ing a new state. Its functions ceased the moment the new govern-
ment took on form and life. The election was, therefore, illegal.
They went on to say further that the law of Viriginia had not been
complied with, and that, finally and decisively, a majority of the voters
of the district had no opportunity to participate. Yet Mr. Blair, who
was chosen to succeed Mr. Carlile in the eleventh district on the same
day and under the same authority, had already been admitted with-
out reference to a committee. Mr. Dawes had insisted, in the face
of objections, that this case was clear on its face and in fact and
ought not to be referred; and it was, indeed, pretty well known
that there had been a full, fair and free expression of the wishes of
the district. It therefore appears that the alleged illegality of the
call was treated as cumulative with other irregularities in the case of
Mr. Segar; and was overborne in the case of Mr. Blair by the fact
that there had been a full, fair and free choice in his district, con-
ducted at the polls in essential conformity to law. Still, if the first
point made by the committee in the Segar case really means any
thing, it is hard to harmonize with it the implied ruling of the House
in the Blair case, supported, as the former is, by later rulings; and
probably it is not best to try to do so. Mr. Blair's primna facik
title to a seat was confirmed by the House without an investigation
by the committee, an essential difference despite the attitude of the
committee's chairman.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Representation in the National Congress from the Seceding States
Subject
The topic of the resource
US Politics
Description
An account of the resource
Accounts of how the US Congress dealt with members representing seceding states.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Frederick W. Moore
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
The American Historical Review
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Oxford University Press
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
January 1897
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Public Domain
Charles Upton
Congress
Secession
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/284e417661541e717e21dd482cb5f1c3.gif
8b98176bc5d0ac378538584a298467db
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Photographs
Still Image
A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Union Zouaves
Subject
The topic of the resource
Union Soldiers in Arlington, VA
Description
An account of the resource
Union Zouaves of the 23rd New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment posing in front of a tent in an unidentified camp during the Civil War.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Mathew Brady
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Library of Congress
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1861
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Public Domain
23rd New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment
Union Zouaves
-
https://mtcwia.com/files/original/5d61fb037b31bf3e804296cf42cef0f8.jpeg
aae2c7648129a005655d55aa516ce9f1
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Photographs
Still Image
A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Major Luzerne Todd of Co. D, 23rd New York Infantry Regiment
Subject
The topic of the resource
Todd, Luzerne,--1822-1910
- United States.--Army.--New York Infantry Regiment, 23rd (1861-1863)--People
- United States.--Army.--New York Infantry Regiment, 86th (1861-1865)--People
- African Americans--Children--1860-1870
- Soldiers--Union--1860-1870
- Military uniforms--Union--1860-1870
- Servants--1860-1870
- Daggers & swords--1860-1870
- Tents--1860-1870
- Military life--1860-1870
- United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Military personnel--Union
Description
An account of the resource
Major Luzerne Todd of Co. D, 23rd New York Infantry Regiment with servant at a camp in Arlington, VA
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Library of Congress
https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/pnp/ppmsca/49700/49750v.jpg
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
unknown
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1861
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Public Domain
Co. D 23rd New York Infantry
Major Luzerne Todd